Monday, August 19, 2019
Euthanasia Essay - Artificial Life or Natural Death? :: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide
      Artificial Life or Natural Death?                 Euthanasia has been a hotly debated about  topic for the past couple of     decades, but has recently been thrust into the limelight by many  controversial     court and hospital decisions.                 Euthanasia is defined as the "mercy killing"  of a person who is brain     dead, terminally ill or otherwise at death's door. This usually, but not     necessarily, affects people who are are separated from death only by  machines.     Whether you personally believe "mercy killing" is a viable solution in a     hopeless situation or not the proponents for both sides provide arguments  that     can be quite convincing. Supporters of euthanasia say that it is such an     improbability for a miraculous recovery and a return to a normal life that it  is     not worth putting the patient through all the suffering and agony that     prolonging their life would cause or the fortune of hospital bills that  you     would pay. The opposition feels that it is not right for people to abandon  other     members of the human race because there is always a chance, even though it is  a     small one, that they will regain all functons and return to a normal  life.                 There are many cases in which euthanasia is  acceptable. Brain death is     one situation which merits euthanasia. It is also one of the more common  cases     where euthanasia is requested. Brain death is when all brain activities  cease.                 The lines are fairly well drawn in the law  about patients who are     suffering but are still compotent, but when the law is asked to determine  the     fate of a lingering, comatose, incompotent patient the lines begin to blur.  In     many cases the courts turned to the patient's family, but what if there are  not     any or they disagree?  In such cases who decides? In a controversial  decision a     Massachusetts court allowed that it would invoke its own "substitute  judgement"     on behalf of a mentally ill woman. In a second case mentioned in the January  7     issue of Newsweek, a Minnesota Surpreme court turned to three hospital  ethics     committees to review a dying loner's case, followed their collected wisdom  and     ordered him off the respirator so that he could have a dignified death.   "It is     					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.